Alterations in energy expenditure and muscle performance following short-term muscle immobilization and rehabilitative exercise in mice

Article information

Phys Act Nutr. 2025;29(4):64-74

Publication date (electronic) : 2025 December 30

doi : https://doi.org/10.20463/pan.2025.0036

Sunghwan Kyun ¹^,², Gyuli Kwon ¹, Deunsol Hwang ¹^,², Inkwon Jang ¹^,², Taeho Kim ¹^,², Hun-Young Park ¹^,², Sung-Woo Kim ¹^,², Kiwon Lim ¹^,²^,³, Jisu Kim ¹^,²^,

¹Department of Sports Medicine and Science, Konkuk University, Seoul, Republic of Korea

²Physical Activity and Performance Institute (PAPI), Konkuk University. Seoul, Republic of Korea

³Department of Physical Education, Konkuk University, Seoul, Republic of Korea

^*Corresponding author : Jisu Kim, Ph.D. Department of Sports Medicine and Science, Graduate School, Konkuk University, 120 Neungdong-ro, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul, 05029, Republic of Korea. Tel: +82-2-450-3827, Fax: +82-2-452-6027 E-mail: kimpro@konkuk.ac.kr

Received 2025 September 1; Revised 2025 December 1; Accepted 2025 December 11.

Abstract

[Purpose]

This study aimed to investigate the systemic metabolic and functional consequences of short-term hindlimb immobilization and to determine the role of rehabilitative exercise in facilitating recovery of muscle mass, function and whole-body energy metabolism.

[Methods]

Male ICR mice (n = 20) underwent 2 weeks of unilateral hindlimb immobilization, followed by 2 weeks of recovery with (n = 10) or without (n = 10) treadmill-based rehabilitative exercise. Whole-body energy metabolism (oxygen uptake, carbon dioxide production, respiratory exchange ratio, carbohydrate oxidation, fat oxidation, energy expenditure) was measured with body composition, grip strength, and gait analysis at three points: pre-immobilization, post-immobilization, and recovery

[Results]

Immobilization induced significant reductions in body weight, lean mass, grip strength, and stride length, confirming rapid onset of immobilization-induced muscle atrophy. Paradoxically, despite the reduction in muscle mass and function, immobilization increased oxygen uptake, carbon dioxide production, fat oxidation, and energy expenditure, while reducing the respiratory exchange ratio. During recovery, exercise promoted lean mass restoration, increased grip strength and improved gait performance compared with passive recovery. Exercise also maintained carbohydrate utilization and energy expenditure, counteracting the decline observed in the passive recovery group.

[Conclusion]

Short-term immobilization induces both structural and functional impairments and maladaptive systemic metabolic alteration such as enhanced fat oxidation and increased energy cost due to potential inefficiency. In contrast, rehabilitative exercise effectively restores muscle mass and function and supports metabolic flexibility. These findings underscore the importance of early low-intensity exercise as a strategy to preserve muscular and metabolic health during recovery from muscle immobilization.

Keywords: immobilization; muscle atrophy; energy expenditure; substrate utilization; metabolic flexibility; rehabilitative exercise

INTRODUCTION

Skeletal muscle is not only the primary organ responsible for body movement but also plays a central role in systemic metabolic homeostasis [1]. Clinically, immobilization, defined as the intentional or unintentional restriction of movement of a body part caused by fracture, injury or disease, is known to induce muscle atrophy [2]. Even a short period of immobilization (e.g., with a cast, splint, or brace) can lead to a rapid loss of muscle mass, and subsequent decline in strength and functional capacity [3,4]. Moreover, because skeletal muscle accounts for a substantial proportion of resting energy expenditure and serves as a primary site for carbohydrate and fat oxidation [5-7], immobilization-induced muscle atrophy (IMA) may profoundly alter whole-body energy expenditure and substrate utilization patterns [8-10].

Previous studies have demonstrated that IMA disrupts skeletal muscle protein homeostasis by reducing protein synthesis and increasing protein degradation, thereby driving atrophy [11-13]. In addition to these structural consequences, IMA is associated with metabolic disturbances, such as impaired mitochondrial biogenesis and function, shifts in fiber-type composition, changes in fuel utilization, and altered activity of key regulators (e.g., AMPK and PGC-1α), among other processes [14-17]. Collectively, these changes indicate broader metabolic reprogramming that highlights vulnerability in systemic energy regulation, given the central role of skeletal muscle in whole-body metabolism [18]. Consequently, muscle disturbances induced by immobilization have the potential to impair whole-body metabolic homeostasis, which in turn may predispose individuals to metabolic inefficiency or impaired recovery [19]. However, the systemic metabolic effects of immobilization on energy expenditure and substrate oxidation remain poorly characterized. Therefore, elucidating the metabolic alterations that occur during the atrophy stage of immobilization is essential to inform targeted intervention strategies.

Physical activity is a well-established intervention for maintaining or recovery skeletal muscle and function, and is therefore considered a central strategy during [20,21]. Previous studies have predominantly focused on the structural and functional benefits of exercise, demonstrating improvements in muscle size, strength, and performance following periods of immobilization [4,22]. However, given that IMA induces metabolic reprogramming that may influence recovery, the assessment of whole-body metabolism during the rehabilitation phase is equally important. Exercise has been shown to exert profound metabolic effects, including enhanced mitochondrial activity and biogenesis, increased oxidative enzyme capacity, and improved vascular adaptations [23-25]. In addition to supporting local muscular recovery, these systemic adaptations indicate that exercise could also play a critical role in normalizing whole-body energy expenditure and substrate utilization following immobilization. Nevertheless, most existing studies have been limited to muscle-specific or indirect metabolic markers, and few have directly examined how rehabilitative exercise influences whole-body expenditure and substrate utilization during recovery from IMA.

Therefore, in the present study we employed a mouse hindlimb immobilization model to longitudinally examine the effects of short-term immobilization and subsequent rehabilitative exercise on whole-body energy metabolism and muscle function. Specifically, we assessed whether immobilization alters energy expenditure and substrate utilization, and whether exercise during the recovery phase can modulate these changes whole facilitating the restoration of muscle mass and functional performance. By integrating systemic metabolic measurements with assessments of muscle mass and strength, this study provides a comprehensive evaluation of the metabolic and functional consequence IMA. Our findings aim to advance the understanding of how rehabilitative exercise influences whole-body energy metabolism following immobilization, thereby offering mechanistic insights that may inform the development of effective strategies for preventing and mitigating IMA.

METHODS

Animals

Eight-week-old male Institute of Cancer Research (ICR) mice (Orient Bio Inc., Seongnam, Republic of Korea) were acclimatized to the laboratory environment for at least 2 weeks under controlled conditions: a 12-hour light/dark cycle, an air-conditioned room maintained at 23-24 °C with 45-50% relative humidity. The mice were provided with a standard commercial diet (5L79, Orient Bio Inc., Seongnam, Republic of Korea) and water ad libitum. All experimental procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Konkuk University (Approval Number: KU230220).

Experimental design

This study was designed as a longitudinal investigation of the effects of short-term immobilization and subsequent rehabilitative exercise on energy metabolism and muscle function. This study was performed over a total period of four weeks (Figure 1). During the first two weeks (atrophy phase), all mice (n = 20) underwent right hindlimb immobilization by casting to induce IMA [26,27]. Following cast removal, the mice entered two weeks recovery phase and were randomly assigned to two groups using simple randomization: Non-exercise group (n = 10), which underwent recovery without exercise intervention, and Exercise group (n = 10), which performed rehabilitative exercise during the recovery phase. Randomization was performed by an investigator who was not involved in outcome assessment. All measurements of body composition, whole-body energy metabolism, grip strength, and gait were conducted by investigators blinded to group allocation during data collection. Measurements were performed at three time points: pre-IMA (before immobilization), post-IMA (immediately after immobilization), and recovery (after recovery phase).

Figure 1.

Schematic representation of experimental design and procedure.

Immobilization-induced muscle atrophy (IMA)

IMA was induced by immobilizing the right hindlimb of each mouse using a modified casting method based on the previous studies (Figure 2) [28,29]. The hindlimb was fixed with a plastic stick and secured with surgical tape. The health and well-being of the mice were monitored daily to ensure that any signs of distress or injury were promptly addressed.

Figure 2.

Immobilization-induced muscle atrophy using a modified casting method.

Treadmill exercise protocol

Treadmill exercise was performed using a small-animal treadmill. The exercise regimen was designed to deliver low-intensity training (18 m/min, 15° incline, 30 minutes per session), 5 days per week, based on the methods our previous study [30]. Exercise was initiated 24 hours after cast removal to minimize musculoskeletal stress during the early recovery phase. The initial treadmill speed was set low and progressively increased over the first several sessions (10-12 m/min for 10-20 minutes) before reaching 18 m/min for 30 minutes, all performed at a 15° incline, to further reduce strain during recovery [31].

Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA)

DXA was used to evaluate the body composition and right calf lean mass. A specific region of interest (ROI) encompassing the whole-body and right calf muscle was defined, as shown in Figure 3. The ROI was carefully set to include the whole-body and the skeletal muscle of the hindlimb while excluding adjacent bone structures to ensure accurate measurement of lean mass.

Figure 3.

Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA).

A specific region of interest (ROI) was focused on the right hindlimb muscle.

Whole-body metabolic analysis at rest

The measurement of whole-body energy metabolism at rest was conducted using a metabolic analyzer for 24 h. The metabolic chambers were constructed using the open-circuit method, with an average flow rate of 1L/min. Each chamber was connected to an acrylic tube to control the air volume. Respiratory gases (oxygen uptake and carbon dioxide production) were analyzed using a mass spectrometer (ARCO-2000-GS-8, ARCO System, Chiba, Japan) equipped with a switching system from each chamber every 15 s. Based on the measured oxygen uptake and carbon dioxide production, respiratory exchange rate, carbohydrate oxidation, fat oxidation, and energy expenditure were calculated [32].

Grip strength

Grip strength was measured using strength meter (JDA-22, JEUNG DO BIO&PLANT, Seoul, Korea). The mice were positioned to grasp the grid of the apparatus securely with their fore and hindlimb. The tail was gently pulled backward until the grip was released. Each mouse underwent three measurements, and the average value was recorded as grip strength (gram-force, gf)

Gait analysis

As previously described, the gait test was performed to evaluate balance and motor coordination [33]. A runway, 15 cm wide and 42 cm length, was lined with white paper. Prior to the experiment, all mice were trained to walk smoothly across the runway without stopping. The hind paws of the mice were painted with non-toxic, washable paint during the experimental assessments. Each mouse was allowed to walk across runway, leaving a series of footprints. Measurements were repeated in two trials, and the collected footprints were analyzed to measure the intrastep distance.

Statistical analysis

All data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics 25 and visualized using GraphPad Prism (version 10.2). The Shapiro-Wilk test was applied to assess the normality of data distribution. For the atrophy phase, paired t-tests were used to evaluate immobilization intervention (pre- vs post-IMA). Body weight across time was analyzed using repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA). For the recovery phase, comparisons between two groups (Non-exercise vs Exercise) over time (post-IMA vs recovery) were analyzed two-way mixed ANOVA, followed by Bonferroni-adjusted post hoc tests for pairwise comparisons. When assumption of normality or homogeneity was violated, non-parametric alternatives (e.g., Wilcoxon signed-rank test or Kruskal-Wallis test, as appropriate) were applied. Daily food intake was recorded at the cage level, and therefore individual-level analysis was not possible; these data are presented descriptively without statistical testing. All data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) and statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

Atrophy phase: Body weight and food intake

During the atrophy phase, body weight showed a progressive reduction across the immobilization period (Figure 4A). These findings indicated that short-term immobilization leads to a gradual but significant loss of body mass. In contrast, daily food intake did not exhibit differences across the immobilization period according to descriptive inspection (Figure 4B). These results indicated that reductions in body weight were likely driven by immobilization-induced tissue loss rather than changes in nutritional intake.

Figure 4.

Changes in body weight and food intake during the atrophy phase.

Body weight (A) and food intake (B) were monitored throughout the immobilization period. Daily food intake is presented descriptively and did not show consistent differences across time. Pre-IMA, pre-immobilization; D1-14, day after immobilization. Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. ^* p < 0.05 indicates statistical significance.

Atrophy phase: body composition of lean and fat mass

DXA analysis revealed significant changes in body composition following immobilization. Total fat mass and fat mass percentage did not show significant changes between the pre- and post-IMA (Figure 5A, B). In contrast, total lean mass was significantly reduced after immobilization compared with pre-IMA (p < 0.05) (Figure 5C). Calf lean mass, representing the immobilized limb, showed a marked reduction after immobilization (p < 0.05) (Figure 5D), further confirming localized muscle atrophy. These results demonstrated that the decline in body weight observed during immobilization was primarily attributable to losses in lean mass rather than changes in adiposity.

Figure 5.

Changes in body composition during the atrophy phase.

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) analysis of fat mass (A), fat mass percentage (B), lean mass (C), and calf lean mass (D) before and after immobilization. Pre-IMA, pre-immobilization; post-IMA, post-immobilization. Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. ^* p < 0.05 indicates statistical significance.

Atrophy phase: Muscle function of strength and locomotion

Grip strength was significantly decreased after immobilization compared with the pre-IMA (p < 0.05) (Figure 6A), indicating a decline in overall muscle force-generating capacity. Walking length also exhibited a significant reduction on both the left and right sides following immobilization (p < 0.05) (Figure 6B, C). These results demonstrate that short-term immobilization not only reduced muscle but also impaired functional performance, as reflected by diminished grip strength and locomotor ability.

Figure 6.

Changes in grip strength and walking length during the atrophy phase.

Grip strength (A) and walking length of left (B) and right (C) were measured before and after immobilization. Pre-IMA, pre-immobilization; post-IMA, post-immobilization. Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. ^* p < 0.05 indicates statistical significance.

Atrophy phase: Energy metabolism

Immobilization induced marked alterations in whole-body energy metabolism. Both oxygen uptake and carbon dioxide production were significantly increased after immobilization compared with pre-IMA (p < 0.05) (Figure 7A, B). The respiratory exchange ratio was significantly reduced (p < 0.05), suggesting a relative shift toward enhanced lipid utilization despite increasing oxygen uptake and carbon dioxide production (Figure 7C). Consistent with this interpretation, fat oxidation was significantly elevated following immobilization (p < 0.05) (Figure 7D), whereas carbohydrate oxidation remained unchanged (Figure 7E). Total energy expenditure also increased significantly after immobilization (p < 0.05) (Figure 7F), indicating that immobilization was accompanied by a paradoxical elevation in metabolic demand despite reduction in muscle mass and function.

Figure 7.

Changes in energy metabolism during the atrophy phase.

Indirect calorimetry analysis of oxygen uptake (A), carbon dioxide production (B), respiratory exchange rate (C), fat oxidation (D), carbohydrate oxidation (E), and total energy expenditure (F) were measured before and after immobilization. Pre-IMA, pre-immobilization; post-IMA, post-immobilization. Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. ^* p < 0.05 indicates statistical significance.

Recovery phase: Body weight and food intake

During the recovery phase, body weight increased progressively in both groups over the 2-week recovery phase (time effect, p < 0.001) (Figure 8A). However, no significant group effect or interaction was detected, indicating that exercise did not produce an additional effect on overall body weight compared with the non-exercise group. Post hoc comparisons showed significant increase from post-IMA to days 14 in both (p < 0.05), confirming gradual recovery on body weight. Daily food intake increased descriptively over the course of recovery, with slightly higher values observed in the exercise group compared with eh non-exercise group (Figure 8B). However, these findings are based on descriptive observations, as no formal statistical analysis was performed.

Figure 8.

Changes in body weight and food intake during the recovery phase.

Body weight (A) and daily food intake (B) were measured in non-exercise and exercise groups during the recovery period following immobilization. Daily food intake is shown descriptively; no consistent group differences were detected. Post-IMA, post-immobilization; D1-14, day after recovery. Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. * and # indicate statistical significance at p < 0.05 for the non-exercise and exercise groups, respectively.

Recovery phase: body composition of lean and fat mass

DXA analysis demonstrated significant changes in body composition during the recovery phase. Fat mass showed a significant interaction effect (p = 0.047) (Figure 9A), and fat mass percentage exhibited a significant time effect (p = 0.006) (Figure 9B). Post-hoc analysis indicated that significant decreases in both fat mass and fat percentage occurred only in the exercise group. Similarly, lean mass showed a significant time effect (p = 0.029), with recovery-associated increases observed in the exercise group whereas the non-exercise group showed no corresponding improvement (Figure 9C). Calf lean mass demonstrated both a significant time effect (p = < 0.001) and group effect (p = 0.031), with significant improvements detected in the exercise group and higher values compared with the non-exercise group (Figure 9D). Collectively, these findings indicate that although recovery contributed to some normalization of body composition, exercise was essential for restoring lean mass following immobilization.

Figure 9.

Changes in body composition during the recovery phase.

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) analysis of fat mass (A), fat mass percentage (B), lean mass (C), and calf lean mass (D) in the non-exercise and exercise groups following immobilization. Post-IMA, post-immobilization; Recovery, post-recovery. Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. * and # indicate statistical significance at p < 0.05 for between-group and within-group comparisons, respectively.

Recovery phase: Muscle function of strength and locomotion

Grip strength showed a significant time effect (p < 0.001) and interaction effect (p = 0.028) (Figure 10A). Post-hoc analysis indicated that significant improvements from post-IMA to recovery occurred only in the exercise group. The exercise group also exhibited a greater numerical increase compared with the non-exercise group, which approached but did not reach statistical significance. Walking performance demonstrated partial recovery during the recovery period. For the left leg, a significant interaction effect (p = 0.011) was detected, and post-hoc analysis revealed a significant restoration in the exercise group, whereas the non-exercise group showed no significant change (Figure 10B). Right leg walking length followed a similar trend but did not show statistically significant effects (Figure 10C). Together, these results suggest that functional recovery following immobilization was primarily driven by exercise.

Figure 10.

Changes in grip strength and walking length during the recovery phase.

Grip strength (A) and walking length of left (B) and right (C) were measured in non-exercise and exercise groups during recovery after immobilization. Post-IMA, post-immobilization; Recovery, post-recovery. Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. * and # indicate statistical significance at p < 0.05 for between-group and within-group comparisons, respectively.

Recovery phase: Energy metabolism

Oxygen uptake showed significant effects of time (p < 0.001), group (p = 0.021), and interaction (p = 0.019) (Figure 11A). Post-hoc analysis revealed that oxygen uptake significantly decreased from post-IMA to recovery in both groups, with exercise group maintaining significantly higher values during recovery phase. Carbon dioxide production demonstrated significant time (p < 0.001), group (p = 0.043), and interaction (p = 0.023) effects (Figure 11B). Post-hoc comparison indicated that carbon dioxide production significantly decreased in non-exercise group, resulting in lower values compared with exercise group at recovery. Respiratory exchange ratio showed a significant time effect (p = 0.030), with the exercise group exhibiting significant increase from post-IMA to recovery, whereas no significant change was observed in the non-exercise group (Figure 11C). Fat oxidation revealed a significant effect of time (p < 0.001), decreasing in both groups during recovery, with no additional group or interaction effects (Figure 11D). Carbohydrate oxidation displayed a significant interaction effect (p = 0.043). Post-hoc analysis revealed a modest reduction in the non-exercise group during recovery (p = 0.064), whereas values were relatively maintained in the exercise group, leading to between-group differences at recovery (Figure 11E). Energy expenditure displayed significant time (p < 0.001), group (p = 0.024), and interaction (p = 0.019) effects (Figure 11F). Post-hoc analysis revealed that energy expenditure decreased significantly in both groups, although the decline was greater in the non-exercise group, resulting in significantly higher values in the exercise group at recovery. Collectively, these results indicate that rehabilitative exercise contributed to the modulation of whole-body energy metabolism during the recovery period.

Figure 11.

Changes in energy metabolism during the recovery phase.

Indirect calorimetry analysis of oxygen uptake (A), carbon dioxide production (B), respiratory exchange rate (C), fat oxidation (D), carbohydrate oxidation (E), and total energy expenditure (F) were measured in non-exercise and exercise groups during recovery after immobilization. Post-IMA, post-immobilization; Recovery, post-recovery. Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. * and # indicate statistical significance at p < 0.05 for between-group and within-group comparisons, respectively.

DISCUSSION

This study demonstrated that short-term hindlimb immobilization induced pronounced reduction in body weight, lean mass, and muscle function, confirming the rapid onset of immobilization. In addition to these structural and functional changes, immobilization elicited marked alterations in systemic energy metabolism. Oxygen uptake, carbon dioxide production, and total energy expenditure increased, whereas the respiratory exchange ratio decreased and fat oxidation increased, indicating a shift toward greater lipid utilization. These unexpected metabolic alterations suggest a maladaptive response, potentially stemming from compromised movement economy and compensatory gait adjustments required due to the unilateral immobilization. During the recovery phase, rehabilitative exercise played a critical role in facilitating muscle mass and metabolic restoration. Exercise, but not passive recovery, promoted reductions in fat mass, increases in lean mass, and improvements in grip strength and walking performance. Moreover, exercise helped modulate the metabolic changes observed during passive recovery and was associated with the maintenance of higher carbohydrate utilization and energy expenditure.

In the present study, short-term immobilization induced decline whole body and right calf lean mass and impairment strength and locomotor, thereby confirming the rapid onset of IMA. These findings are consistent with previous studies indicating that immobilization induces muscle atrophy and functional impairments [3,4,14]. Interestingly, the results of increased energy expenditure following immobilization are noteworthy, as it contrasts with several previous studies reporting decreased metabolic demand during disuse [34,35]. This paradoxical rise in energy expenditure appears to result from locomotor inefficiency and compensatory gait alterations resulting from unilateral immobilization [36]. Consistent with this interpretation, previous studies have demonstrated that knee immobilization markedly increases the energy expenditure of movement [37,38]. Indeed, gait analysis revealed reduced stride length in both hindlimbs, indicating that biomechanical imbalance imposed additional energetic costs despite overall reductions in muscle mass. Thus, even localized immobilization may not simply reduce global activity but can increase systemic metabolic demand beyond the affected limb.

Moreover, the observed alterations in substrate utilization, accompanied by elevated fat oxidation, suggest an impairment in metabolic flexibility. Immobilization-induced insulin resistance compromises this crucial adaptability, as muscle atrophy has been closely linked to reduced insulin sensitivity in skeletal muscle [39-41]. Mechanistically, immobilization has been shown to depress skeletal muscle insulin signaling. Specifically, studies report reduced Akt phosphorylation and impaired GLUT4 translocation, which together limit glucose uptake even when circulating insulin levels are maintained [42,43]. Consistently, previous studies have reported diminished glucose disposal and enhanced lipid utilization during periods of immobilization [8,44].

In addition, hormonal and inflammatory perturbations may contribute to this shift in substrate preference and to the paradoxical increase in energy expenditure. The acute physical stress of immobilization, including inflammation and elevated glucocorticoids, can increase resting energy expenditure and whole-body protein turnover [45,46]. Elevated circulating glucocorticoids under physical stress can promote lipolysis, exert catabolic effects on muscle, and subsequently increase the availability and oxidation of fatty acids [47,48]. Immobilization acts as a potent physiological stressor that disrupts endocrine regulation and further reinforces the shift toward lipid metabolism. Collectively, these findings suggest that immobilization contributes to maladaptive metabolic reprogramming characterized by locomotor inefficiency and altered substrate utilization.

Exercise is well-established intervention for restoring skeletal muscle mass and reversing function impairments caused by immobilization [4,22]. Consistently, the results of the present study demonstrated that rehabilitative exercise exerted clear benefits for restoration of both muscle mass and function during the recovery phase. Beyond its effects on muscular restoration, exercise also improved the maladaptive metabolic responses observed during passive recovery, as reflected by the maintenance of higher value of oxygen uptake and carbon dioxide production, along with greater carbohydrate oxidation and overall energy expenditure. These results suggest that exercise restored metabolic flexibility by supporting carbohydrate utilization and balancing substrate oxidation.

In addition, preservation of carbohydrate oxidation observed in the exercise group is likely to attributable enhanced regenerative processes at the cellular level [49]. Improved insulin signaling following rehabilitative exercise may further contribute to this pattern by facilitating glucose uptake into recovering muscle, thereby sustaining glycolytic flux during periods of active regeneration [50]. The activation of satellite cells and myogenic progenitors has been shown to depend on glycolytic flux, with intermediates such as pyruvate and lactate contributing both energy supply and signaling pathways the regulate myogenic differentiation [51-53]. Furthermore, carbohydrate metabolism supplies rapid ATP generation to sustain the wide array of biochemical processes required for cellular regeneration [54,55]. Therefore, by maintaining carbohydrate utilization during the recovery phase, rehabilitative exercise may have fulfilled the energetic and biosynthetic demands of muscle regeneration, thereby promoting structural recovery in parallel with systemic metabolic restoration.

Despite these meaningful findings, several limitations should be acknowledged. First, this study employed a mouse model, which may not fully capture the complex physiological responses observed in humans. Second, while systemic metabolic parameters were assessed comprehensively, molecular mechanisms underlying altered substrate utilization (e.g., insulin sensitivity, mitochondrial biogenesis, or fiber-type specific adaptations) were not directly investigated. Future studies incorporating molecular analyses and extending these findings to human cohorts will be essential to elucidate the mechanisms driving immobilization-induced metabolic reprogramming and to refine rehabilitative interventions. Third, this experiment did not perform statistical comparisons between the Recovery endpoint and the Pre-IMA baseline, because animals were randomized into exercise and non-exercise groups only after the immobilization phase. This design limited our ability to formally evaluate complete restoration to baseline levels, and future studies should employ long-term follow-up designs that allow direct assessment of recovery kinetics and completeness.

Nevertheless, the present findings demonstrate that short-term immobilization induces both structural atrophy and maladaptive systemic metabolic alterations, whereas rehabilitative exercise effectively promotes muscle recovery and restores metabolic flexibility. Collectively, these results underscore the pivotal role of exercise in mitigating the consequences of disuse and provide mechanistic insights that may inform therapeutic strategies for populations at risk of immobilization-induced impairments. These findings have critical clinical implications for human populations, particularly given the rapid onset of both muscular and metabolic disturbances. This has particular relevance for metabolically vulnerable groups such as older adults with sarcopenia, patients with type 2 diabetes, and adolescents undergoing growth and development. In these populations, the observed maladaptive shift toward enhanced fat oxidation and compromised movement efficiency could significantly worsen existing insulin resistance and accelerate muscle loss. Notably, even brief periods of immobilization were sufficient to elicit systemic metabolic disturbances, highlighting the importance of early intervention. Timely initiation of low-intensity rehabilitative exercise may therefore represent a critical strategy to preserve metabolic flexibility, maintain muscular integrity, and prevent the compounding effects of disuse-induced metabolic stress during recovery.

Notes

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

This research was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Re-search Foundation of Korea (NRF), funded by the Ministry of Education (RS-2023-00276232 and NRF-2023S1A5A8080047). This paper was supported by KU Research Professor Program of Konkuk University.

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

1. Mukund K, Subramaniam S. Skeletal muscle: A review of molecular structure and function, in health and disease. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med 2020;12(1)e1462.

2. Atherton PJ, Greenhaff PL, Phillips SM, Bodine SC, Adams CM, Lang CH. Control of skeletal muscle atrophy in response to disuse: clinical/preclincical contentions and fallacies of evidence. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2016;311:594–604.

3. Gao Y, Arfat Y, Wang H, Goswami N. Muscle atrophy induced by mechanical unloading: Mechanisms and potential countermeasures. Front Physiol 2018;9:235.

4. Peltz CD, Sarver JJ, Dourte LAM, Würgler-Hauri CC, Williams GR, Soslowsky LJ. Exercise following a short immobilization period is detrimental to tendon properties and joint mechanics in a rat rotator cuff injury model. J Orthop Res 2010;28(7):841–5.

5. Wu X, Patki A, Lara-Castro C, Cui X, Zhang K, Grace Walton R, Osier M V, Gadbury GL, Allison DB, Martin M, Timothy Garvey W, Garvey WT. Genes and biochemical pathways in human skeletal muscle affecting resting energy expenditure and fuel partitioning. J Appl Physiol 2011;110(3):746–55.

6. Melzer K. Carbohydrate and fat utilization during rest and physical activity. E Spen Eur E J Clin Nutr Metab 2011;6(2):e45–e52.

7. Smith AG, Muscat GEO. Skeletal muscle and nuclear hormone receptors: Implications for cardiovascular and metabolic disease. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2005;37(10):2047–63.

8. Shur NF, Simpson EJ, Crossland H, Chivaka PK, Constantin D, Cordon SM, Constantin-Teodosiu D, Stephens FB, Lobo DN, Szewczyk N, Narici M, Prats C, Macdonald IA, Greenhaff PL. Human adaptation to immobilization: Novel insights of impacts on glucose disposal and fuel utilization. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2022;13(6):2999–3013.

9. Huang L, Li M, Deng C, Qiu J, Wang K, Chang M, Zhou S, Gu Y, Shen Y, Wang W, Huang Z, Sun H. Potential Therapeutic Strategies for Skeletal Muscle Atrophy. Antioxidants 2022;12(1):44.

10. Hirose M, Kaneki M, Sugita H, Yasuhara S, Jeevendra Martyn JA, J Martyn JA. Immobilization depresses insulin signaling in skeletal muscle. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2000;279(6):E1235–41.

11. Wall BT, Dirks ML, Snijders T, Van Dijk JW, Fritsch M, Verdijk LB, Van Loon LJC. Short-term muscle disuse lowers myofibrillar protein synthesis rates and induces anabolic resistance to protein ingestion. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2016;310:E137–47.

12. Holwerda AM, Weijzen MEG, Zorenc A, Senden J, Jetten GHJ, Houben LHP, Verdijk LB, van Loon LJC. One Week of Single-Leg Immobilization Lowers Muscle Connective Protein Synthesis Rates in Healthy, Young Adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2024;56(4):612–22.

13. Kincheloe GN, Roberson PA, Toro AL, Stanley BA, Stanley AE, Jefferson LS, Dennis MD, Kimball SR. Loss of 4E-BPs prevents the hindlimb immobilization-induced decrease in protein synthesis in skeletal muscle. J Appl Physiol 2023;134(1):72–83.

14. Ohno Y, Nakatani M, Matsui Y, Suda Y, Ito T, Ando K, Yokoyama S, Goto K. Effect of Oral Lactate Administration on Skeletal Muscle Mass in Mice Under Different Loading Conditions. In Vivo 2025;39(1):218–27.

15. Deane CS, Piasecki M, Atherton PJ. Skeletal muscle immobilisation-induced atrophy: mechanistic insights from human studies. Clin Sci 2024;138(12):741–56.

16. Akın Ş, Burçin Kubat G, Demirel HA. Exercise, mitochondrial biogenesis and disuse-induced atrophy. Turk J Sports Med 2021;56(2):91–7.

17. Saveko AA, Shenkman BS. Effects of Various Muscle Disuse States and Countermeasures on Muscle Molecular Signaling. Int J Mol Sci 2021;23(1):468.

18. Argilés JM, Campos N, Lopez-Pedrosa JM, Rueda R, Rodriguez-Mañas L. Skeletal Muscle Regulates Metabolism via Interorgan Crosstalk: Roles in Health and Disease. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2016;17(9):789–96.

19. Fleury F, Santos-Júnior U, Terra D, Nonato T, Sales F, Cavalcante Á, Soares PM, Ceccatto VM. Consequences of immobilization and disuse: a short review. Int J Basic Appl Sci 2013;2(4):297.

20. Hirabara SM, Marzuca-Nassr GN, Cury-Boaventura MF. Nutrition and Exercise Interventions on Skeletal Muscle Physiology, Injury and Recovery: From Mechanisms to Therapy. Nutrients 2024;16(2):293.

21. Hughes DC, Ellefsen S, Baar K. Adaptations to endurance and strength training. Vol. 8, Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 2018;8(6):a029769.

22. Guo X, Zhou Y, Li X, Mu J. Resistance exercise training improves disuse-induced skeletal muscle atrophy in humans: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2025;26(1):134.

23. Hood DA, Memme JM, Oliveira AN, Triolo M. Maintenance of Skeletal Muscle Mitochondria in Health, Exercise, and Aging. Annu Rev Physiol 2025;81:19–41.

24. Deval C, Calonne J, Coudy-Gandilhon C, Vazeille E, Bechet D, Polge C, Taillandier D, Attaix D, Combaret L. Mitophagy and mitochondria biogenesis are differentially induced in rat skeletal muscles during immobilization and/or remobilization. Int J Mol Sci 2020;21(10):3691.

25. Vargas-Mendoza N, Angeles-Valencia M, Morales-González Á, Madrigal-Santillán EO, Morales-Martínez M, Madrigal-Bujaidar E, Álvarez-González I, Gutiérrez-Salinas J, Esquivel-Chirino C, Chamorro-Cevallos G, Cristóbal-Luna JM, Morales-González JA. Oxidative stress, mitochondrial function and adaptation to exercise: New perspectives in nutrition. Life 2021;11(11):1269.

26. Chacon-Cabrera A, Lund-Palau H, Gea J, Barreiro E. Time-Course of muscle mass loss, damage, and proteolysis in gastrocnemius following unloading and reloading: Implications in chronic diseases. PLoS One 2016;11(10)e0164951.

27. Kawanishi N, Funakoshi T, Machida S. Time-course study of macrophage infiltration and inflammation in cast immobilization-induced atrophied muscle of mice. Muscle Nerve 2018;57(6):1006–13.

28. Friedman MA, Zhang Y, Wayne JS, Farber CR, Donahue HJ. Single limb immobilization model for bone loss from unloading. J Biomech 2019;83:181–9.

29. Aihara M, Hirose N, Katsuta W, Saito F, Maruyama H, Hagiwara H. A new model of skeletal muscle atrophy induced by immobilization using a hook-and-loop fastener in mice. J Phys Ther Sci 2017;29(10):1779–83.

30. Hwang D, Seo JB, Park HY, Kim J, Lim K. Capsiate intake with exercise training additively reduces fat deposition in mice on a high-fat diet, but not without exercise training. Int J Mol Sci 2021;22(2):769.

31. Hwang D, Kyun S, Jang I, Kim T, Kim N, Kim J, Lim K, Kwon I. Establishing VO2peak-based exercise intensity classification and physiological validation in ICR mice. Phys Act Nutr 2025;29(3):64–72.

32. Jang I, Kim J, Kyun S, Hwang D, Lim K. Acute administration of exogenous lactate increases carbohydrate metabolism during exercise in mice. Metabolites 2021;11(8):553.

33. Mulherkar S, Liu F, Chen Q, Narayanan A, Couvillon AD, Shine HD, Tolias KF. The Small GTPase RhoA Is Required for Proper Locomotor Circuit Assembly. PLoS One 2013;8(6)e7015.

34. Maggio ABR, Martin XE, Tabard-Fougère A, Delhumeau C, Ceroni D. What is the real impact of upper limb cast immobilisation on activity-related energy expenditure in children? BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med 2018;4(1)e000359.

35. Pinto AJ, Bergouignan A, Dempsey PC, Roschel H, Owen N, Gualano B, Dunstan DW. Physiology of sedentary behavior. Physiol Rev 2023;103(4):2561–622.

36. Ghoseiri K, Zucker-Levin A. Long-term locked knee ankle foot orthosis use: A perspective overview of iatrogenic biomechanical and physiological perils. Front in Rehabil Sci 2023;4:1138792.

37. McCain EM, Libera TL, Berno ME, Sawicki GS, Saul KR, Lewek MD. Isolating the energetic and mechanical consequences of imposed reductions in ankle and knee flexion during gait. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2021;18(1):21.

38. Hanada E, Kerrigan DC. Energy consumption during level walking with arm and knee immobilized. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;82(9):1251–4.

39. Dirks ML, Wall BT, Van De Valk B, Holloway TM, Holloway GP, Chabowski A, Goossens GH, Van Loon LJ. One week of bed rest leads to substantial muscle atrophy and induces whole-body insulin resistance in the absence of skeletal muscle lipid accumulation. Diabetes 2016;65(10):2862–75.

40. Kawamoto E, Koshinaka K, Yoshimura T, Masuda H, Kawanaka K. Immobilization rapidly induces muscle insulin resistance together with the activation of MAPKs (JNK and p38) and impairment of AS160 phosphorylation. Physiol Rep 2016;4(15)e12876.

41. Kerr NR, Mossman CW, Chou CH, Bunten JM, Kelty TJ, Childs TE, Rector RS, Arnold WD, Grisanti LA, Du X, Booth FW. Hindlimb immobilization induces insulin resistance and elevates mitochondrial ROS production in the hippocampus of female rats. J Appl Physiol 2024;137(3):512–26.

42. Kawamoto E, Koshinaka K, Yoshimura T, Masuda H, Kawanaka K. Immobilization rapidly induces muscle insulin resistance together with the activation of MAPK s (JNK and p38) and impairment of AS 160 phosphorylation. Physiol Rep 2016;4(15)e12876.

43. Xu PT, Song Z, Zhang WC, Jiao B, Yu ZB. Impaired translocation of GLUT4 results in insulin resistance of atrophic soleus muscle. Biomed Res Int 2015;2015:291987.

44. Burns AM, Nixon A, Mallinson J, Cordon SM, Stephens FB, Greenhaff PL. Immobilisation induces sizeable and sustained reductions in forearm glucose uptake in just 24 h but does not change lipid uptake in healthy men. J Physiol 2021;599(8):2197–210.

45. Shimba A, Cui G, Abe S, Hirota K, Miyauchi E, Takami D, Tani-Ichi S, Kato R, Tajima M, Kanahashi T, Miyazaki M. Stress-induced glucocorticoids enhance acute inflammation by promoting the differentiation of Th17 cells. Cell Rep 2025;44(8):116093.

46. Mottale R, Dupuis C, Szklarzewska S, Preiser JC. The metabolic response to stress in critical illness: updated review on the pathophysiological mechanisms, consequences, and therapeutic implications. Ann Intensive Care 2025;15(1):174.

47. Djurhuus CB, Gravholt CH, Nielsen S, Mengel A, Christiansen JS, Schmitz OE, Møller N, Men-gel A. Effects of cortisol on lipolysis and regional interstitial glycerol levels in humans. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2002;283(1):E172–7.

48. Dobre MZ, Virgolici B, Cioarcă-Nedelcu R. Lipid Hormones at the Intersection of Metabolic Imbalances and Endocrine Disorders. Curr Issues Mol Biol 2025;47(7):565.

49. Mul JD, Stanford KI, Hirshman MF, Goodyear LJ. Exercise and Regulation of Carbohydrate Metabolism. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci 2015;135:17–37.

50. Whytock KL, Goodpaster BH. Unraveling Skeletal Muscle Insulin Resistance: Molecular Mechanisms and the Restorative Role of Exercise. Circ Res 2020;137(2):184–204.

51. Nalbandian M, Radak Z, Takeda M. Lactate Metabolism and Satellite Cell Fate. Front Physiol 2020;11:610983.

52. Coller HA. The paradox of metabolism in quiescent stem cells. FEBS Lett 2019;593(20):2817–39.

53. Yucel N, Wang YX, Mai T, Porpiglia E, Lund PJ, Markov G, Garcia BA, Bendall SC, Angelo M, Blau HM. Glucose Metabolism Drives Histone Acetylation Landscape Transitions that Dictate Muscle Stem Cell Function. Cell Rep 2019;27(13):3939–55.e6.

54. Heiden MGV, Cantley LC, Thompson CB. Understanding the warburg effect: The metabolic requirements of cell proliferation. Science 2009;324(5930):1029–33.

55. Folmes CD, Nelson TJ, Terzic A. Energy metabolism in nuclear reprogramming. Biomark Med 2011;5(6):715–29.

Article information Continued

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.