Phys Act Nutr Search

CLOSE


Phys Act Nutr > Volume 29(3); 2025 > Article
Ortiz and Brothers: The Impact of a commercially available thermogenic caffeinated beverage on indices of energy expenditure and substrate utilization

Abstract

[Purpose]

Overweight and obesity contribute to the development of cardiovascular, neurocognitive, and metabolic diseases. One approach that has recently gained popularity in combating overweight and obesity is the consumption of energy or thermogenic beverages, owing to their proposed ability to boost metabolism and increase fat burning. However, whether Reign Storm Valencia Orange can exert positive effects remains unknown. This study hypothesized that consumption of Reign Storm Valencia Orange would acutely increase energy expenditure and fat utilization relative to water consumption.

[Methods]

Thirty-two individuals (17 females and 15 males) participated in this study. Arterial blood pressure, normalized oxygen consumption, resting energy expenditure (REE), and respiratory exchange ratio (RER) were assessed during rest at baseline and at 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes after beverage consumption (randomized order).

[Results]

Arterial pressure was elevated following beverage consumption (main effect of time, p < 0.05), with no significant difference between the conditions (main effect of beverage, p > 0.15). Normalized oxygen consumption and REE were elevated following beverage consumption (main effect of time; p < 0.01 for both) with a significant interaction (p < 0.01 for both), indicating a greater impact of Reign Storm Valencia Orange. RER was reduced following beverage consumption (main effect of time; p < 0.0001), with a significant interaction (p < 0.0001), indicating a greater impact of the Reign Storm Valencia Orange condition. Consumption of Reign Storm Orange Valencia had a beneficial impact on indices of resting energy expenditure and metabolism and resulted in greater reliance on fats.

[Conclusion]

Accordingly, Reign Storm beverages, in combination with other modifiable lifestyle behaviors such as exercise and a healthy diet, can potentially assist in losing body weight and burning fat.

INTRODUCTION

Obesity has reached epidemic proportions in the United States (US) and worldwide [1]. For example, ~71% of the US population ≥20 yr of age are classified as overweight and/or obese, with ~42% of these individuals being in the obese category [1]. Notably, overweight and obesity are responsible for the total direct medical cost of approximately $260 billion in the US alone. More importantly, these conditions are well-known major risk factors for a wide spectrum of pathophysiological conditions and diseases, including various metabolic, cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, and neurocognitive conditions/disease states [1]. Furthermore, being overweight and obese are closely linked to various forms of cancer [2-8]. Accordingly, investigating strategies, including modifiable lifestyle behaviors, are critical for minimizing or preventing the aforementioned financial and pathophysiological conditions associated with overweight/obesity.
Historically, there has been no shortage of approaches utilized in an effort to combat the prevalence and/or detrimental health outcomes of being overweight/obese. These strategies include various pharmacological, surgical, and lifestyle behavioral approaches, which have demonstrated varying degrees of success [9-15]. The reasons for these mixed results are multifactorial, with an intricate web of factors, including time availability, ease of implementation, and numerous psychological, cultural, psychosocial, and physiological underpinnings. Of the many factors involved, the consumption of a healthier and/or low-calorie diet and augmented caloric expenditure in the form of increased physical activity (or a combination of these two approaches) are commonly recommended as the first course of action in terms of lifestyle behavioral modifications [12]. In recent years, the consumption of thermogenic caffeinated beverages (i.e., beverages that reportedly boost metabolism and increase fat burning) is growing in popularity [16-19]. There are many possible reasons for this increase, with the most commonly reported factors being the desire to increase energy levels, resting caloric expenditure, and resting metabolic rate while simultaneously reducing body fat [16,17,19-22]. Importantly, a unique potential benefit to the consumption of these beverages is that they are relatively inexpensive, and there are fewer “barriers” to implementation compared to other approaches such as diet and exercise; that is, they do not require a meaningful time commitment, specialized equipment, memberships, etc.
Despite this increase in popularity, there are limited well-designed, placebo-controlled studies aimed at assessing the impact of these beverages on well-validated indices of resting energy expenditure and resting metabolic rate. Accordingly, the primary purpose of this investigation was to assess the impact of acute consumption of a commercially available thermogenic caffeinated beverage on the indices of energy expenditure and substrate utilization in a cohort of healthy individuals. The secondary purpose was to examine the impact of a commercially available thermogenic caffeinated beverage on heart rate and arterial blood pressure. Comparisons were made relative to the placebo condition, in which all measures were repeated before and after consuming a similar volume of water. We hypothesized that consuming caffeinated thermogenic beverages would acutely increase indices of energy expenditure and fat utilization relative to water-alone conditions.

METHODS

Ethical Approval: All procedures were approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Texas at Arlington (UTA IRB: 2024-0095). The participants were provided a verbal description of all procedures, purposes, and risks before providing written informed consent. This study conformed to the Declaration of Helsinki and is a registered clinical trial under the identifier NCT06330649 at www.clinicaltrials.gov.
Participant Characteristics: Thirty-two participants (17 females and 15 males) completed both conditions of the study. None of the participants reported being regular consumers of caffeinated beverages (i.e., coffee, energy drinks, or thermogenic beverages), as defined by consuming no more than two such beverages per week. Data collection was completed during two different visits to the laboratory, with each visit separated by a minimum of 24 hours (see below for detailed information about each study visit). All participants were normotensive, free of overt cardiometabolic or other diseases, nonsmokers, and did not currently consume vitamin- or mineral-based supplements. Participants were excluded if they were taking vasoactive medications or had overt cardiovascular, metabolic, or neurological diseases.
Study Visit Conditions: All outcome variables (see below) were assessed immediately before and at 30-minute intervals for 2 hours after consuming either a thermogenic caffeinated beverage or an equal volume of water. For the thermogenic beverage condition, participants drank a 12-oz can of a commercially available thermogenic beverage, Reign Storm Valencia Orange, which contains 10 calories and various ingredients, including 0 g of Total Fat, 280 mg of sodium, 5 g of total carbohydrate, 0 g of total sugar, 200 mg of plant-based caffeine, and 0 g of protein, as well as green tea extract (45% epigallocatechin EGCG), guarana, guayusa, and vitamins B3, B5, B6, B7, B12, zinc, and chromium. In the control condition, the participants consumed 12 oz of commercially available bottled water. All individuals participated in both conditions, and the order of drinking was randomized within each individual. Each day, the beverages were consumed within a 15-minute period. Visits were conducted at the same time of the day for each individual to minimize potential circadian influences on the outcome variables.
Instrumentation and Measurements: All data were collected following a minimum of 4 hours of fasting. Prior to each data collection visit, participants refrained from strenuous exercise and caffeinated or alcoholic beverages for a minimum of 24 hours, and all data were collected in a temperature-controlled laboratory (~24 °C and 40% relative humidity). The phase of the menstrual cycle was recorded but was not controlled. Upon arrival at the laboratory, participants voided their bladders, and their height and body mass were measured using a digital scale and standard stadiometer (Seca 769, Seca North America; Chino, CA, USA).
After sitting quietly in a recliner, each participant was instrumented for continuous measurement of heart rate (electrocardiography; CardioCard, Nasiff Associates; Central Square, NY, USA) and intermittent blood pressure of the brachial artery via an electrosphygmomanometer (Tango+, SunTech; Raleigh, NC, USA). At predetermined time points (see below), the participants were also fitted with a two-way valve mouthpiece and a nose clip (Hans Rudolph, Inc., Shawnee, KS, USA) connected to a metabolic cart (Parvo Medics True One 2400 oxygen uptake units; Sandy, UT, USA) to assess the indices of resting energy expenditure, pulmonary gas exchange, and substrate utilization via indirect calorimetry. The primary variables of interest were defined a priori as resting oxygen consumption normalized to body weight (ml/kg/min), and resting energy expenditure (REE) was calculated using the Weir formula, REE (kcal per day) = 1.44 (3.9 × VO2) + (1.11 × VCO2), which is commonly utilized to assess REE via indirect calorimetry [23]. Finally, substrate utilization was assessed as the respiratory exchange ratio (RER) [24]. The metabolic cart was calibrated according to well-validated guidelines recommended by the company prior to all data-collection visits. Briefly, the calibration included room-air and two-point gas calibrations. This process was followed by a 5-stroke calibration using a Hans Rudolf syringe and varying flow rates.
Data Analysis: The heart rate was continuously assessed throughout the duration of data collection during the study visit. Resting brachial blood pressure was measured in triplicate (⅓ systolic + ⅔ diastolic) at baseline (i.e., pre-beverage consumption), as well as at each post-beverage date collection time point (i.e., 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes post consumption). Likewise, all the aforementioned assessments derived from the metabolic cart were performed at the same time points. Importantly, for each data collection time point, the participant was fitted with the mouthpiece and nose clip and breathed quietly for a minimum of 10 minutes (i.e., baseline, and 20-30, 50-60, 80-90, and 110-120 post-beverage consumption). Values are reported as the average measured during the last 5 minutes of each 10-minute period.
Statistical Analysis: The effect of Reign Storm Valencia Orange vs. water consumption on the measured variables was conducted using a two-way repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) or a mixed-model analysis, with the main effects of beverage (i.e., Reign Storm Valencia Orange vs. water) and time (i.e., baseline, 30, 60, 90, and 120-minute post consumption). Tukey’s post hoc test was performed in the event of a significant interaction. All data were processed using the GraphPad Prism 10 software (GraphPad Software LLC, San Diego, CA, USA). The alpha value was set at p = 0.05.

RESULTS

Characteristics

Thirty-two individuals (17 females and 15 males) completed the data collection for both beverage conditions. The participants were 22 ± 4 y of age and had an average weight of 71 ± 17 kg, height of 162 ± 31 cm, and body mass index of 25 ± 6 kg/m2. There were no differences in any of these variables between the study visits (p > 0.05). All participants reported not being regular consumers of caffeine, defined, a priori, as ≤ 2 caffeinated beverages per week (i.e., coffee, energy drinks, or thermogenic beverages).

Resting Oxygen Consumption

The oxygen consumption normalized to body weight (ml/kg/min) is shown in Figure 1. Resting baseline oxygen consumption normalized for body weight was similar between study visits (water: 3.2 ± 0.7 ml/kg/min; Reign Storm Valencia Orange: 3.4 ± 0.6 ml/kg/min, p = 0.23). There was a significant increase in resting oxygen consumption over time (main effect of time, p < 0.0001) following beverage consumption; however, this effect was augmented following consumption of the Reign Storm Valencia Orange beverage (interaction, p < 0.01). Post-hoc analysis revealed that the differences between conditions reached significance, with values being greater during the Reign Storm Valencia Orange condition at 30, 60, and 120 minutes post-beverage consumption time points (p < 0.05 for all).

Resting Energy Expenditure

The resting energy expenditure measurements are shown in Figure 2. Resting baseline REE was slightly higher during the Reign Storm Valencia Orange study visit (water: 1652 ± 425 kcal·day-1; Reign Storm Valencia Orange: 1754 ± 415 kcal·day-1, p = 0.03). There was a significant increase in REE over time (main effect of time, p < 0.01)Following beverage consumption; however, this effect was augmented following the consumption of the Reign Storm Valencia Orange beverage (interaction; p < 0.04). Post-hoc analysis revealed that the differences between conditions reached significance, with values being greater during the Reign Storm Valencia Orange condition at 30, 60, and 120 minute post-beverage consumption time points (p < 0.05).

Respiratory Exchange Ratio

RER measurements are shown in Figure 3. Resting baseline RER was similar between study visits (water: 0.80 ± 0.07; Reign Storm Valencia Orange: 0.82 ± 0.06 ml/kg/min, p = 0.29). There was a significant reduction in RER over time (main effect of time, p < 0.0001) following beverage consumption; however, this reduction was augmented following the consumption of the Reign Storm Valencia Orange beverage (interaction; p < 0.0001).

Hemodynamic Variables: Blood Pressure and Heart Rate

Heart rate was similar at baseline between study visits (Figure 4A; water: 69 ± 10 bpm; Reign Storm Valencia Orange: 70 ± 11 mm Hg, p = 0.78). There was a modest yet significant reduction in HR (Figure 4A; main effect of time, p < 0.0001) following beverage consumption. However, the effect of time was similar between the beverage conditions (Figure 4A; p = 0.33). There were no differences in baseline systolic blood pressure (Figure 4B; SBP. water: 117 ± 10 mm Hg; Reign Storm Valencia Orange: 118 ± 11 mm Hg, p = 0.48), diastolic (Figure 4C; DBP. water: 72 ± 7 mm Hg; Reign Storm Valencia Orange: 72 ± 7 mm Hg, p = 0.81), or mean arterial blood pressure (Figure 4D; MAP. water: 87 ± 7 mm Hg; Reign Storm Valencia Orange: 87 ± 8 mm Hg, p = 0.92) between study visits. There was a modest yet significant increase in SBP (Figure 4B; main effect of time, p = 0.04), DBP (Figure 4C; main effect of time, p < 0.0001), and MAP (Figure 4D; main effect of time p < 0.0001) following beverage consumption. However, the effect of time was similar between the beverage conditions for each of these variables (SBP, p = 0.15; DBP, p = 0.34; MAP, p = 0.25).

DISCUSSION

This study was designed to test the hypothesis that acute consumption of a commercially available thermogenic beverage, Reign Storm Valencia Orange, would acutely increase indices of energy expenditure and fat utilization relative to the consumption of a volume-matched portion of water. The primary findings were that consumption of the thermogenic beverage resulted in: 1) an augmented increase in metabolism, as indicated by elevated oxygen consumption normalized to body weight, 2) an augmented increase in resting energy expenditure, and 3) a shift in substrate utilization during resting conditions, such that the body is more reliant on fat as its fuel source. Collectively, these results indicated that consumption of Reign Storm beverages appears to have a thermogenic effect that beneficially impact indices of resting energy expenditure and metabolism.
Owing to the prevalence and detrimental physiological outcomes associated with being overweight and obese [1], a great deal of attention and scientific research has been geared towards identifying approaches to combat this public health concern. One approach that has demonstrated positive results in recent years is the consumption of thermogenic beverages [20-22]. The current study was not designed to assess the role of specific ingredients associated with the observed increases in resting energy metabolism or fat utilization. Reign Storm beverages are commonly consumed thermogenic beverages that contain a variety of ingredients, including 200 mg of plant-based caffeine and a proprietary blend of green tea extract (45% EGCG), guarana, guayusa, vitamins B3, B5, B6, B7, B12, zinc, and chromium. It is well-documented that caffeine elevates resting energy expenditure, caloric consumption, and fat oxidation in both normal-weight and obese populations. The most likely mechanistic pathways through which caffeine exerts these effects is through stimulation of β2 and β3 adrenergic receptors [17,19,25] as well as elevations in circulating epinephrine concentrations secondary to activation of the CAMP signaling pathway [17,19]. Similarly, green tea extracts commonly contain EGCG and guarana, and guayusa also contain caffeine. Notably, these ingredients, either individually or in combination, have been demonstrated to increase resting energy expenditure and fat utilization thus likely partially explaining the beneficial effects of green tea extract [17,26]. Accordingly, the combination of ingredients in the Reign Storm beverage appear to result in the observed increase in resting energy expenditure, caloric consumption, lipolysis, and fat utilization in the current study. To this end, in the current study, resting energy expenditure was elevated by approximately 8-14% for up to 2 hours following Reign Storm beverage consumption, which is consistent with previous reports [17].
It has been fairly well established that caffeine induces acute elevations in arterial blood pressure in the order of ~5 mm Hg, likely secondary to peripheral vasoconstriction and, thus, elevations in total peripheral vascular resistance [27-30]. In contrast, the impact of acute consumption of thermogenic beverages on arterial blood pressure is equivocal, with reports indicating increases [31-33] or no effect [34-36]. In the current study, we observed increases in systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial blood pressure for up to 2 hours following the acute consumption of Reign Storm Orange Valencia. Importantly, a similar magnitude of elevation was observed following the consumption of a similar volume of water. The acute elevations in arterial blood pressure could be related to the natural circadian pattern of blood pressure, which gradually increases throughout the course of the day [37]. Another possible explanation could be related to the acute hypertensive effect of the liquid. In this regard, an acute increase in both systolic and diastolic blood pressure has been observed in both hypertensive and normotensive individuals following the consumption of approximately 16 oz of water [38]. This response is likely related to increased sympathetic nervous system activation, which results in elevated arterial blood pressure through various pathways [38,39]. While these studies [38,39] only assessed the impact of water consumption on arterial blood pressure and sympathetic nervous system activation, it is reasonable to speculate that the impact is related to plasma volume as opposed to pure water, a finding that may explain the findings of the current study. Similarly, the impact of caffeine and/or thermogenic beverage consumption on the heart rate has been the focus of numerous research studies [27-29]. Notably, these findings are inconclusive, with numerous studies reporting directionally different responses [27,30,40]. In the current study, we observed a significant reduction in heart rate for up to 2 hours following the consumption of both the Reign Storm Orange Valencia beverage and water. Importantly, the magnitude of the reduction was similar between the beverage conditions. The most likely explanation is related to the reflex increase in cardiac parasympathetic nervous system [41] activity secondary to the aforementioned elevations in systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial blood pressures that occurred under both beverage conditions.

METHODOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS

The primary purpose of this study was to assess the effect of consuming a commercially available thermogenic beverage on energy expenditure and substrate utilization. Accordingly, by design, we could not isolate the reported effects of any of the specific ingredients in Reign Storm beverage. However, this represents a more practical approach, given that we utilized a beverage that can be easily purchased in the United States and worldwide. While the results demonstrate a beneficial effect of Reign Storm beverage consumption on the indices of resting energy expenditure and substrate utilization, additional studies may be conducted in a larger and more heterogeneous cohort of individuals.

CONCLUSION / PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

In summary, these results indicate that consumption of Reign Storm beverages appears to have a thermogenic effect that results in a beneficial impact on indices of resting energy expenditure and metabolism. Additionally, these results demonstrate that consumption of the Reign Storm beverage results in a shift in fuel source utilization during resting conditions, such that the body is more reliant on fats, and Reign Storm also accelerates metabolism. Accordingly, these findings demonstrate that the consumption of Reign Storm beverages in combination with other modifiable lifestyle behaviors, such as exercise and a healthy diet, appears to help to lose body weight and burn fat.

Notes

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

AO contributed to the study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, and manuscript drafting. RMB contributed to the study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, and the editorial process of this manuscript. All authors contributed to the data collection and editorial process of the manuscript. Both authors approved the final version of the manuscript.

Notes

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors would like to express their appreciation to all the participants for their participation in this study. Funding for this project was provided by Beverage Research Consultants, LLC. All aspects of the project were reviewed by the authors of the manuscript.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figure 1.

Oxygen consumption normalized for body weight (ml/kg/min) in the 32 participants during baseline (i.e., pre-beverage consumption) as well as at 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes following consumption of either 12 oz of commercially available water (black bars) or 12 oz of Reign Storm Orange Valencia (gray bars).

Resting baseline oxygen consumption normalized for body weight was similar between study visits (p = 0.23). Resting oxygen consumption significantly increased over time following beverage consumption (main effect of time, p < 0.0001); however, this effect was augmented following consumption of the Reign Storm Valencia Orange beverage (interaction; p < 0.01). * indicates a significant difference between beverage conditions within the specific time point.
pan-2025-0019f1.jpg
Figure 2.

Resting energy expenditure (REE) in the 32 participants during baseline (i.e., pre-beverage consumption) as well as at 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes following consumption of either 12 oz of commercially available water (black bars) or 12 oz of Reign Storm Orange Valencia (gray bars).

Resting baseline REE was slightly higher during the Reign Storm Valencia Orange study visit (p = 0.03). REE increased over time (main effect of time, p < 0.01) following beverage consumption; however, this effect was augmented following consumption of the Reign Storm Valencia Orange beverage (interaction; p < 0.04). * indicates a significant difference between beverage conditions within the specific time point.
pan-2025-0019f2.jpg
Figure 3.

Respiratory exchange ratio (RER) in the 32 participants during baseline (i.e., pre-beverage consumption) as well as at 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes following consumption of either 12 oz of commercially available water (black bars) or 12 oz of Reign Storm Orange Valencia (gray bars).

Resting baseline RER was similar between study visits (p = 0.29). RER was reduced over time (main effect of time, p < 0.0001) following beverage consumption; however, this reduction was augmented following consumption of the Reign Storm Valencia Orange beverage (interaction; p < 0.0001). ¥ indicates a significant beverage x time interaction.
pan-2025-0019f3.jpg
Figure 4.

Heart rate (Panel A), systolic (Panel B), diastolic (Panel C), and mean (Panel D) blood pressure in the 32 participants during baseline (i.e., pre-beverage consumption) as well as at 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes following consumption of either 12 oz of commercially available water (black bars) or 12 oz of Reign Storm Orange Valencia (gray bars).

Resting baseline values for each variable were similar between conditions (Panels A-D, p > 0.48 for all). There was a modest yet significant reduction in heart rate (Panel A; main effect of time, p < 0.0001) and increases in systolic (Panel B; main effect of time, p = 0.04), diastolic (Panel C; main effect of time, p < 0.0001), and mean (Panel D; main effect of time, p < 0.0001) blood pressure following beverage consumption. However, the effect of time was similar between beverage conditions for each of these variables (heart rate: p = 0.33; systolic blood pressure: p = 0.15; diastolic blood pressure: p = 0.34; mean blood pressure: p = 0.25).
pan-2025-0019f4.jpg

REFERENCES

1. Martin SS, Aday AW, Almarzooq ZI, Anderson CAM, Arora P, Avery CL, Baker-Smith CM, Barone Gibbs B, Beaton AZ, Boehme AK, Commodore-Mensah Y, Currie ME, Elkind MSV, Evenson KR, Generoso G, Heard DG, Hiremath S, Johansen MC, Kalani R, Kazi DS, Ko D, Liu J, Magnani JW, Michos ED, Mussolino ME, Navaneethan SD, Parikh NI, Perman SM, Poudel R, Rezk-Hanna M, Roth GA, Shah NS, St-Onge MP, Thacker EL, Tsao CW, Urbut SM, Van Spall HGC, Voeks JH, Wang NY, Wong ND, Wong SS, Yaffe K, Palaniappan LP; American Heart Association Council on E; Prevention Statistics C; Stroke Statistics S. 2024 heart disease and stroke statistics: a report of US and global data From the American heart association. Circulation 2024;149:e347-e913.
pmid pmc
2. Berrington de Gonzalez A, Hartge P, Cerhan JR, Flint AJ, Hannan L, MacInnis RJ, Moore SC, Tobias GS, Anton-Culver H, Freeman LB, Beeson WL, Clipp SL, English DR, Folsom AR, Freedman DM, Giles G, Hakansson N, Henderson KD, Hoffman-Bolton J, Hoppin JA, Koenig KL, Lee IM, Linet MS, Park Y, Pocobelli G, Schatzkin A, Sesso HD, Weiderpass E, Willcox BJ, Wolk A, Zeleniuch-Jacquotte A, Willett WC, Thun MJ. Body-mass index and mortality among 1.46 million white adults. N Engl J Med 2010;363:2211-9.
pmid pmc
3. Cohen SS, Park Y, Signorello LB, Patel AV, Boggs DA, Kolonel LN, Kitahara CM, Knutsen SF, Gillanders E, Monroe KR, Berrington de Gonzalez A, Bethea TN, Black A, Fraser G, Gapstur S, Hartge P, Matthews CE, Park SY, Purdue MP, Singh P, Harvey C, Blot WJ, Palmer JR. A pooled analysis of body mass index and mortality among African Americans. PLoS One 2014;9:e111980.
crossref pmid pmc
4. Kitahara CM, Flint AJ, Berrington de Gonzalez A, Bernstein L, Brotzman M, MacInnis RJ, Moore SC, Robien K, Rosenberg PS, Singh PN, Weiderpass E, Adami HO, Anton-Culver H, Ballard-Barbash R, Buring JE, Freedman DM, Fraser GE, Beane Freeman LE, Gapstur SM, Gaziano JM, Giles GG, Hakansson N, Hoppin JA, Hu FB, Koenig K, Linet MS, Park Y, Patel AV, Purdue MP, Schairer C, Sesso HD, Visvanathan K, White E, Wolk A, Zeleniuch-Jacquotte A, Hartge P. Association between class III obesity (BMI of 40-59 kg/m2) and mortality: a pooled analysis of 20 prospective studies. PLoS Med 2014;11:e1001673.
crossref pmid pmc
5. Adams KF, Schatzkin A, Harris TB, Kipnis V, Mouw T, Ballard-Barbash R, Hollenbeck A, Leitzmann MF. Overweight, obesity, and mortality in a large prospective cohort of persons 50 to 71 years old. N Engl J Med 2006;355:763-78.
crossref pmid
6. Sun M, da Silva M, Bjorge T, Fritz J, Mboya IB, Jerkeman M, Stattin P, Wahlstrom J, Michaelsson K, van Guelpen B, Magnusson PKE, Sandin S, Yin W, Lagerros YT, Ye W, Nwaru B, Kankaanranta H, Lonnberg L, Chabok A, Isaksson K, Pedersen NL, Elmstahl S, Lind L, Hedman L, Haggstrom C, Stocks T. Body mass index and risk of over 100 cancer forms and subtypes in 4.1 million individuals in Sweden: the obesity and disease development sweden (ODDS) pooled cohort study. Lancet Reg Health Eur 2024;45:101034.
crossref pmid pmc
7. Pati S, Irfan W, Jameel A, Ahmed S, Shahid RK. Obesity and cancer: a current overview of epidemiology, pathogenesis, outcomes, and management. Cancers (Basel) 2023;15.
crossref pmid
8. Afshin A, Reitsma MB, Murray CJL. Health Effects of Overweight and Obesity in 195 Countries. N Engl J Med 2017;377:1496-7.

9. Rubino F, Schauer PR, Kaplan LM, Cummings DE. Metabolic surgery to treat type 2 diabetes: clinical outcomes and mechanisms of action. Annu Rev Med 2010;61:393-411.
crossref pmid
10. Sandoval D. Bariatric surgeries: beyond restriction and malabsorption. Int J Obes (Lond) 2011;35 Suppl 3:S45-9.
crossref pmid pdf
11. Doar JW, Wilde CE, Thompson ME, Sewell PF. Influence of treatment with diet alone on oral glucose-tolerance test and plasma sugar and insulin levels in patients with maturity-onset diabetes mellitus. Lancet 1975;1:1263-6.
crossref pmid
12. Wadden TA, Tronieri JS, Butryn ML. Lifestyle modification approaches for the treatment of obesity in adults. Am Psychol 2020;75:235-51.
crossref pmid pmc
13. Courcoulas AP, Patti ME, Hu B, Arterburn DE, Simonson DC, Gourash WF, Jakicic JM, Vernon AH, Beck GJ, Schauer PR, Kashyap SR, Aminian A, Cummings DE, Kirwan JP. Long-term outcomes of medical management vs bariatric surgery in type 2 diabetes. JAMA 2024;331:654-64.
crossref pmid pmc
14. Parmar RM, Can AS. Dietary Approaches to Obesity Treatment. StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): 2025.

15. Wilding JPH, Batterham RL, Calanna S, Davies M, Van Gaal LF, Lingvay I, McGowan BM, Rosenstock J, Tran MTD, Wadden TA, Wharton S, Yokote K, Zeuthen N, Kushner RF, Group SS. Once-weekly semaglutide in adults with overweight or obesity. N Engl J Med 2021;384:989-1002.
crossref pmid
16. Prather JM, Florez CM, Vargas A, Soto B, Harrison A, Willoughby D, Tinsley G, Taylor L. The effects of a thermogenic supplement on metabolic and hemodynamic variables and subjective mood states. J Int Soc Sports Nutr 2023;20:2185538.
crossref pmid pmc
17. Rodriguez C, Stratton MT, Harty PS, Siedler MR, Boykin JR, Green JJ, Keith DS, White SJ, DeHaven B, Brojanac A, Tinoco E, Taylor LW, Tinsley GM. Effects of a ready-to-drink thermogenic beverage on resting energy expenditure, hemodynamic function, and subjective outcomes. J Int Soc Sports Nutr 2023;20:2211958.
crossref pmid pmc
18. Vaughan RA, Conn CA, Mermier CM. Effects of commercially available dietary supplements on resting energy expenditure: a brief report. ISRN Nutr 2014;2014:650264.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
19. Outlaw J, Wilborn C, Smith A, Urbina S, Hayward S, Foster C, Wells S, Wildman R, Taylor L. Effects of ingestion of a commercially available thermogenic dietary supplement on resting energy expenditure, mood state and cardiovascular measures. J Int Soc Sports Nutr 2013;10:25.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
20. Bloomer RJ, Canale RE, Blankenship MM, Hammond KG, Fisher-Wellman KH, Schilling BK. Effect of the dietary supplement Meltdown on catecholamine secretion, markers of lipolysis, and metabolic rate in men and women: a randomized, placebo controlled, cross-over study. Lipids Health Dis 2009;8:32.
crossref pmid pmc
21. Bloomer RJ, Fisher-Wellman KH, Hammond KG, Schilling BK, Weber AA, Cole BJ. Dietary supplement increases plasma norepinephrine, lipolysis, and metabolic rate in resistance trained men. J Int Soc Sports Nutr 2009;6:10.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
22. Roberts MD, Dalbo VJ, Hassell SE, Stout JR, Kerksick CM. Efficacy and safety of a popular thermogenic drink after 28 days of ingestion. J Int Soc Sports Nutr 2008;5:19.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
23. Weir JB. New methods for calculating metabolic rate with special reference to protein metabolism. J Physiol 1949;109:1-9.
crossref pmid pmc
24. Bergman BC, Brooks GA. Respiratory gas-exchange ratios during graded exercise in fed and fasted trained and untrained men. J Appl Physiol 1999;86:479-87.
crossref pmid
25. Wilborn C, Taylor L, Poole C, Bushey B, Williams L, Foster C, Campbell B. Effects of ingesting a commercial thermogenic product on hemodynamic function and energy expenditure at rest in males and females. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 2009;34:1073-8.
crossref pmid
26. Campbell B, Wilborn C, La Bounty P, Taylor L, Nelson MT, Greenwood M, Ziegenfuss TN, Lopez HL, Hoffman JR, Stout JR, Schmitz S, Collins R, Kalman DS, Antonio J, Kreider RB. International Society of Sports Nutrition position stand: energy drinks. J Int Soc Sports Nutr 2013;10:1.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
27. Robertson D, Frolich JC, Carr RK, Watson JT, Hollifield JW, Shand DG, Oates JA. Effects of caffeine on plasma renin activity, catecholamines and blood pressure. N Engl J Med 1978;298:181-6.
crossref pmid
28. Myers MG. Effects of caffeine on blood pressure. Arch Intern Med 1988;148:1189-93.
crossref pmid
29. Whitsett TL, Manion CV, Christensen HD. Cardiovascular effects of coffee and caffeine. Am J Cardiol 1984;53:918-22.
crossref pmid
30. Ammar R, Song JC, Kluger J, White CM. Evaluation of electrocardiographic and hemodynamic effects of caffeine with acute dosing in healthy volunteers. Pharmacotherapy 2001;21:437-42.
crossref pmid
31. Steinke L, Lanfear DE, Dhanapal V, Kalus JS. Effect of “energy drink” consumption on hemodynamic and electrocardiographic parameters in healthy young adults. Ann Pharmacother 2009;43:596-602.
crossref pmid pdf
32. Grasser EK, Dulloo AG, Montani JP. Cardiovascular and cerebrovascular effects in response to red bull consumption combined with mental stress. Am J Cardiol 2015;115:183-9.
crossref pmid
33. Grasser EK, Yepuri G, Dulloo AG, Montani JP. Cardio- and cerebrovascular responses to the energy drink Red Bull in young adults: a randomized cross-over study. Eur J Nutr 2014;53:1561-71.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
34. Alford C, Cox H, Wescott R. The effects of red bull energy drink on human performance and mood. Amino acids 2001;21:139-50.
crossref pmid pdf
35. Lockwood CM, Moon JR, Smith AE, Tobkin SE, Kendall KL, Graef JL, Cramer JT, Stout JR. Low-calorie energy drink improves physiological response to exercise in previously sedentary men: a placebo-controlled efficacy and safety study. J Strength Cond Res 2010;24:2227-38.
crossref pmid
36. Ragsdale FR, Gronli TD, Batool N, Haight N, Mehaffey A, McMahon EC, Nalli TW, Mannello CM, Sell CJ, McCann PJ, Kastello GM, Hooks T, Wilson T. Effect of Red Bull energy drink on cardiovascular and renal function. Amino acids 2010;38:1193-200.
crossref pmid pdf
37. Neutel JM, Smith DH. The circadian pattern of blood pressure: cardiovascular risk and therapeutic opportunities. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 1997;6:250-6.
pmid
38. Callegaro CC, Moraes RS, Negrao CE, Trombetta IC, Rondon MU, Teixeira MS, Silva SC, Ferlin EL, Krieger EM, Ribeiro JP. Acute water ingestion increases arterial blood pressure in hypertensive and normotensive subjects. J Hum Hypertens 2007;21:564-70.
crossref pmid pdf
39. Scott EM, Greenwood JP, Gilbey SG, Stoker JB, Mary DA. Water ingestion increases sympathetic vasoconstrictor discharge in normal human subjects. Clin Sci (Lond) 2001;100:335-42.
crossref pmid
40. Buscemi S, Mattina A, Tranchina MR, Verga S. Acute effects of coffee on QT interval in healthy subjects. Nutr J 2011;10:15.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
41. Mancia G, Grassi G. The autonomic nervous system and hypertension. Circ Res 2014;114:1804-14.
crossref pmid


ABOUT
ARTICLE CATEGORY

Browse all articles >

BROWSE ARTICLES
EDITORIAL POLICY
FOR CONTRIBUTORS
Editorial Office
Korea University, 145 Anam-Ro, Seongbuk-gu,Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea
Tel: +82-10-2235-0018    Fax: +82-2-3290-2315    E-mail: jenbedit@gmail.com                

Copyright © 2025 by Korean Society for Exercise Nutrition.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next