Phys Act Nutr Search


Instructions for reviewers

  • HOME
  • Instructions for reviewers

Peer review is one of the important procedures used to ensure that the quality of articles. The peer reviewer's report is an evaluation or critique that is used by the authors of the draft to improve the product. Peer review typically evaluates the clarity of hypotheses, the validity of the research design, the quality of data collection procedures, the robustness of the methods employed, and limitations of the overall articles. Physical Activity and Nutrition(PAN) reviews all received articles. Manuscripts are sent to section editor, and than section editor sent it again to the two or three most relevant referees, for reviews of the manuscripts. The editor selects referees results of the review will be classified as follows;

Accepted: The manuscript will be forwarded to the publisher without further corrections.
Minor revisions: The author should address the comments from the reviewers, which will be confirmed by the reviewers before being sent to the publisher.
Major revisions: The author should address the comments from the reviewers and make the appropriate corrections for review by the two reviewers.
Rejection: When one out of the reviewers rejects the manuscript, the final decision is made by the editorial committee.


Browse all articles >

Editorial Office
Korea University, 145 Anam-Ro, Seongbuk-gu,Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea
Tel: +82-10-2235-0018    Fax: +82-2-3290-2315    E-mail:                

Copyright © 2021 by Korean Society for Exercise Nutrition.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next